5. 14.2012
the tour
and augusta
pga tour commissioner tim finchem’s inartful
reply to a question about augusta national’s lack of
female members caused quite a stir. the commish
said: “we have concluded a number of times now,
and we have certainly not moved off of this, that we
are not going to give up the masters as a tournament on our tour. it’s too important. and so, at the
end of the day, the membership of that club have
to determine their membership. they are not doing
anything illegal.” what finchem should have said
was that the masters, just like the u.s. open, the
british open and the pga championship, are not
tournaments on his, or anyone else’s, tour no matter
how important the pga tour likes to think it is. ultimately, although influential, the tour has no control
over the major championships. none. the pga tour
conducts its tournaments on non-discriminatory
courses. it might prefer that augusta national admit
women, but it has no sway over angc’s internal
workings, regardless of where you come down
on that issue. the idea that, somehow, the pga
tour could influence its members to not play in the
masters (as if it could—it can’t even get them to
play in their own events), or that the masters would
not count as an “official” event, with all the ramifications that would have on money list titles and points
races, is pure poppycock. —J.M.
06
david cannon/getty images
cover // contents // 10 things // zinger’s corner // pga tour // rank and file //equipment // tim rosaforte